# No.955 (NSR)

 No.955  N.Shankar Ram (India) Original Problems, Julia’s Fairies – 2015 (II): July – December    →Previous ; →Next ; →List 2015(II) Please send your original fairy problems to: julia@juliasfairies.com

No.955 by N.Shankar Ram –  “6×6 cycle of W & B moves” (NSR). Kamikaze Chess is implemented in WinChloe only. Applying of Kamikaze behavior to all pieces for Popeye doesn’t work as well, as Kamikaze seems to not work with fairy pieces. (JV)

Definitions:

Kamikaze Chess: Excepting Ks, pieces disappear after making a capture.

Diagram Circe: A captured piece is reborn on the square it occupied in the diagram position.

Ibis(I): (1,5) Leaper. (notation “15” for Popeye).

Triton(TR): Marine piece operating along Rook lines: without capture moves as Rook, with capture – as Locust (capturing an enemy unit, arrives on the square immediately beyond that unit, which must be vacant).

 No.955 N.Shankar Ram India original – 22.11.2015 Solution: (click to show/hide) White Kd1 Rh2 Pf2f7 TRe1g1 Black Kf1 Sb1 Be8 Rb2c3a5b6c7c8d8 Pd3d4d5d6d7 IBd2 s#7                                           (6+16) Kamikaze Chess Diagram Circe Ibis d2 Triton e1, g1 1.Rh2-g2! threat: 2.TRe1-e3+ d4*e3 [-e3][+wTRe1] 3.TRe1-e2+ d3*e2[-e2][+wTRe1] { } 4.TRe1-e7+ IBd2*e7[-e7][+wTRe1] 5.TRe1-e6+ d7*e6[-e6][+wTRe1] { } 6.TRe1-e5+ d6*e5[-e5][+wTRe1] 7.TRe1-e4+ d5*e4[-e4][+wTRe1] # { } 1...Rc3-c4{display-departure-square} 2.TRe1-e2+d3*e2[-e2][+wTRe1] 3.TRe1-e7+ IBd2*e7[-e7][+wTRe1] { } 4.TRe1-e6+ d7*e6[-e6][+wTRe1] 5.TRe1-e5+ d6*e5[-e5][+wTRe1] { } 6.TRe1-e4+ d5*e4[-e4][+wTRe1] 7.TRe1-e3+ d4*e3[-e3][+wTRe1]# { } 1...Rb2-b4{display-departure-square} 2.TRe1-e7+ IBd2*e7[-e7][+wTRe1] 3.TRe1-e6+ d7*e6[-e6][+wTRe1] { } 4.TRe1-e5+ d6*e5[-e5][+wTRe1] 5.TRe1-e4+ d5*e4[-e4][+wTRe1] { } 6.TRe1-e3+ d4*e3[-e3][+wTRe1] 7.TRe1-e2+ d3*e2[-e2][+wTRe1]# { } 1...Rc7-c4{display-departure-square} 2.TRe1-e6+ d7*e6[-e6][+wTRe1] 3.TRe1-e5+ d6*e5[-e5][+wTRe1] { } 4.TRe1-e4+ d5*e4[-e4][+wTRe1] 5.TRe1-e3+ d4*e3[-e3][+wTRe1] { } 6.TRe1-e2+ d3*e2[-e2][+wTRe1] 7.TRe1-e7+ IBd2*e7[-e7][+wTRe1]# { } 1...Rb6-b4{display-departure-square} 2.TRe1-e5+ d6*e5[-e5][+wTRe1] 3.TRe1-e4+ d5*e4[-e4][+wTRe1] { } 4.TRe1-e3+ d4*e3[-e3][+wTRe1] 5.TRe1-e2+ d3*e2[-e2][+wTRe1] { } 6.TRe1-e7+ Id2*e7[-e7][+wTRe1] 7.TRe1-e6+ d7*e6[-e6][+wTRe1]# { } 1...Ra5-a4 2.TRe1-e4+ d5*e4[-e4][+wTRe1] 3.TRe1-e3+ d4*e3[-e3][+wTRe1] { } 4.TRe1-e2+ d3*e2[-e2][+wTRe1] 5.TRe1-e7+ Id2*e7[-e7][+wTRe1] { } 6.TRe1-e6+ d7*e6[-e6][+wTRe1] 7.TRe1-e5+ d6*e5[-e5][+wTRe1]# { (C+ by WinChloe 3.32)} 6x6 cycle of W & B moves (ABCDEF/BCDEFA/CDEFAB/DEFABC/EFABCD/FABCDE). Black "Sixth" battery. White Tr/Tr battery with rebirths of firing piece. Problem is in generalised or extendable form. Can be extended to show 7x7, 8x8, … nxn cycle of W/B moves and "nth" battery with threat and n-1 variations in a s#n+1, by using (n+1)x(n+2) board; Black (1,n-1) leaper and n-1 BPs above the WK; and n-1 BRs behind the BPs; n>6. (Author)

### 11 Responses to No.955 (NSR)

1. Kjell Widlert says:

It seems so simple when you have the mechanism – but it takes a stroke of genius to invent that!
White wants to force all pieces between Rd8 and Kd1 to capture out of the line. But if White (after the key) plays 2.TRe2+, for example, he can never force dxe3 as the Rc3 will capture instead. So White must open the only line that has no bR behind the d-file piece, and the threat is 2.TRe3+ dxe3. At this point, White doesn’t have to fear the opening of the third row as dxe3 has already occurred, so he can continue 3.TRe2+ dxe3, after which the second row may be opened by 3.TRe7+ Ixe7; etc.
In the variations, Black puts a R on the fourth row but in turn leaves another row empty – so White can play in the same manner as before, but starting at a different point of the circle of e-file squares.

A wonderful idea, that doesn’t need a bigger board and a larger cycle to impress.

2. seetharaman says:

Strikingly simple when you understand it! Shankar had shown a 3×3 cycle in orthodox S#3 earlie (1st Pr. The Problemist,1983) which is considered a pioneer for the theme. It has taken more than 30 years and his genius to extend that scheme into a 6×6 cycle. Bravo Shankar and welcome back to your old form. I hope priming in time for the 10-WCCT !

• Ganapathi says:

A great problem indeed, Shankar! Would not have understood the beauty without Kjell Widlert’s comments.
Can Seetha show Shankar’s Problemist S#3 please?

3. Georgy Evseev says:

It is interesting that exactly fourth row should be “rook free” in diagram position – otherwise leaper move will become refutation.

4. shankar ram says:

And Julia, for publishing so quickly!
Georgy: the 5th row/rank can also be “rook free”, by moving Ra5 to a4. Here, too 1…Ie7 doesn’t defeat the threat. In fact it allows additional duals.

5. Luce Sebastien says:

I am very happy that Julia publishes a new problem after some difficult days…
And it is a beaufiful one, celebrating the thought,
which is the greatest richness of humanity.
Congratulations M.Shankar Ram
(hope my english is good)

• shankar ram says:

Thank you, Luce!
I think you’re referring to Paris?
We here faced similar thing in Mumbai, 2008. Our hearts are with all of you in Paris and France.
Your English is not just good, it’s better than my French!

6. Luce Sebastien says:

Yes I am from Paris, very close from St Denis (north periphery of Paris). Thank you for you mail, M. Shankar Ram,
best to you
Sebastien

• seetharaman says:

We still cannot get over the horror of Mumbai 2008 (26/11). Repetitive barbaric attacks on Paris is heart-rending. Naturally all of us are with the people of France.

7. shankar ram says:

The board size for larger cycles is actually “n div 2 + 5 x n+2”, n>3 (div = integer division), and not “n+1 x n+2”, n>6 (only works for n=7,8!).
Generalised or “infinite” problems were pioneered by T.R.Dawson. Some famous examples are his “Lunar Q” and “Infinite Nowotny” problems.