No.1160 
Stephan Dietrich (Germany)

JF-LOGO-1

Original Problems, Julia’s Fairies – 2016 (II): July – December

   →Previous ; →Next ; →List 2016(II)

Please send your original fairy problems to: julia@juliasfairies.com


Definitions: (click to show/hide)


No.1160 Stephan Dietrich
Germany

original – 27.11.2016

Solution: (click to show/hide)

white TRf4 MSg5 POg7 black POh8

#4                                                (3+1)
Triton f4
Marine Knight g5
Poseidon g7, h8


Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joost
Joost
November 28, 2016 10:08

Why a marine knight on g5? A pawn works just as well.

seetharaman
seetharaman
November 29, 2016 21:55
Reply to  Joost

hm… you are right. g5 is only used a block the black poseidon,so it can be pawn. perhaps the composer wanted an all marine board !

Nikola Predrag
Nikola Predrag
November 30, 2016 01:24

Something is wrong with my perception of the essential features of the position. Not only about White in check, but about how Black could have delivered that check.

After that, the bizarre Popeye’s “solution”, illegally skipping B1, looks as a minor issue.

seetharaman
seetharaman
November 30, 2016 18:48
Reply to  Nikola Predrag

black could have captured a white piece from h6 to h8.

seetharaman
seetharaman
November 30, 2016 18:49

I am sorry…. from h6 white is already in check.

Geoff Foster
Geoff Foster
November 30, 2016 23:23

In the given solution, the first line (with missing moves) is the threat. The full solution is:

1.POf6! POg8,POh7 2.TRh4 POh8 3.POg6 POg8 4.TRh8#
2…POg8,POf8 3.TRh8+ POg7+ 4.POg6#

Nikola Predrag
Nikola Predrag
November 30, 2016 23:55

Threat is a real variation AFTER some irrelevant random MOVE. No move, no variation and no real threat since it’s simply impossible.

seetharaman
seetharaman
December 1, 2016 07:01

Is it a no solution after 1…POg8 2.TRh4? POh8! 3.TRh3? POg8! 4.TRh8+?

Joost
Joost
December 1, 2016 07:44
Reply to  seetharaman

2…POh8 3. POg6

seetharaman
seetharaman
December 1, 2016 10:29
Reply to  Joost

oh… got it. It should have been given as variation.

Juraj Lörinc
Juraj Lörinc
December 2, 2016 01:43

I find it quite sad that there is long discussion below almost worthless composition, while many worthy problems remain without any comment from readers.

Nikola Predrag
Nikola Predrag
December 2, 2016 02:34

The “almost” worthless composition is not a chess-composition at all in the first place, as being a nonsense with regards to the Chess.

The discussion is by far TOO SHORT with regards to the serious recent increase of nonsense everywhere.
But who cares!? 🙁

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x