Оригинальные задачи (62)

Оригинальные задачи (страница 62)

Оригинальные сказочные задачи, опубликованные в течение 2012-ого года, участвуют в неформальном конкурсе JF-2012!

Сайт в основном посвящен сказочному жанру, но h# и s# тоже будут опубликованы! Пожалуйста, присылайте свои произведения на адрес: julia@juliasfairies.com

Перейти на →Список задач ; →Страницу 61 ;  Страницу 63

Приветствую на сайте хорошо известного Македонского автора и редактора журнала Vratniza-64 – Bosko Miloseski

No.118 – hs#3 – Красивые линейные комбинации в игре черной и белой ладей. (JV)

No.118.1 – hs#3 – And this is a very nice improvement to No.118, coming after about 2,5 months and based on the comments to the 1st version. I’m happy to publish it here as well! (JV)

Вы можете нажать на «Solutions»(решения) чтобы увидеть или спрятать решения!


No.118 Bosko Miloseski
original – 28.08.2012
hs#3            b) pc6→d5             (3+7)
Solution: (click to show/hide)

No.118.1 Bosko Miloseski
original – 11.11.2012
hs#3              2 solutions             (5+9)
Solution: (click to show/hide)

Все диаграммы сделаны на  WinChloe и ее фонт Echecs использован для дизайна Лого.

7 комментариев: Оригинальные задачи (62)

  1. Juraj LörincJuraj Lörinc пишет:

    Twin form seems to be unnecessary. What about the following version?
    White Rg7 Pf6 Kh1
    Black Kh8 Pc5 Rg5 Pd4 Pe4 Rg3

  2. Petko A.PetkovPETKO PETKOV пишет:

    No.118 Bosko Miloseski
    I think that the main question here is not the name of the theme. It’s not so important how we can call it. The problem № 118 has a very significant defect, that in my opinion, essentially reduces its evaluation. It is a repetition of black blocking – moves with black Rooks on g8. This defect should be avoided at all costs, before we think about other improvements!
    Obviously, there’s a lot of possibilities in this aspect, but it is clear – these experiments are difficult and do not lead quickly to the good results.
    I’d like to demonstrate here not the best Version of №118, but just some experimental positions. They can be a basis for a more interesting and meaningful versions:
    1.Ra4-a2 Rf5-f1 2.Ra2-f2 Rc6-h6 3.Rf2-f8+ Rf1xf8‡
    1.Ra4-a5 Rc6-c4 2.Ra5-c5 Rf5-h5 3.Rc5-c8+ Rc4xc8‡

    1.Ra4-a2 Rf5-f1 2.Ra2-f2 Rc6-h6 3.Rf2-f8+ Rf1xf8‡
    1.Ra4-a5 Rc6-c4 2.Ra5-c5 Rf5-h5 3.Rc5-c8+ Rc4xc8‡

    In Version 2 we see two pinned pieces in final position. But I think that it is not an important plus in comparison with Version 1 because here Bh7 is a static pinned piece (as Rg7 of course). If a white piece is static pinned (therefore – it makes not moves in play) we cannot evaluate this pin as a sufficient high plus of a problem (by the by, a technical character has also Bd4).
    Static status of Rg7 is also not so pleasant but here this piece keeps squares around the b.K – therefore Rg7 is a better static figure as Bh7. Therefore I think that V1 is better as V2 but the idea for thematic pins with the “Not Turton Rook” deserves interest – probably – in some other positions or even – in problems in 3.5 or 4 moves with additional thematic motives.

  3. Seetharamanseetharaman пишет:

    hm…. Interesting versions by Petkov. But I thought in the original problem, the blocks on g8 being by different rooks was not a defect.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.