ad 1011) http://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/search.jsp?expression=PROBID=%27P1317524%27
Makes a nice comparison with 849 and 950! Remarkable economy to show the same theme!
Very interesting! For position (b) When 'h4' becomes 'd1' I think board turns clockwise !
Thanks Julia! Indeed the diagram position seems more harmonious now...
I presume there's typo in Arno's FEN, 1 instead of p (+bPa3).
I agree, it's a clear anticipation. Maybe the 'No' means that the sh#5 setting is cooked: 1.Be5 2.Bc4 3.Re3 4.Bd6…
There's no Grimshaw in Arno's or Pierre's h#5. That's probably what Hans has meant by saying "No".
Oh... yes. You are right. I looked at the six-mover only. Ser.h#5 Clear anticipation.
Yes, that is missing in the 6-mover (that has some other advantages) but look at the 5-mover that was published…
Of course there is strong resemblence. But I dont see the grimshaw in this.