This is lovely problem, but I was thinking almost immeadiatedly that is this possible to do with Anti-Andernach -condition. You…
On No.578 (LP)
Thank you for the compliment, such words are read very well 🙂 With magic squares, I did not deal very…
On No.578 (LP)
Dear Ladislav, your AUW with magic squares is really beautiful ! I saw also in Strategems 68 oct 2014 another…
On No.578 (LP)
Twinning is preferable if it is sbutle enough to make one wonder why the other solution will not work. 🙂
On No.611 (SKB&PT)
Dear Shnkar Ram, We already noticed that the problem can be made with a twin by reducing one of the…
On No.611 (SKB&PT)
Paul, your post was perfectly clear as a kind of question and very precious as an encouragement! If the simple…
On No.607 (PH)
I'm not sure about all moves, but there seems to be a rather different play before reaching the same end.…
On No.610 (SL)
In my post, I want to show that two phases are possible. And you produced this little gem. Quod erat…
On No.607 (PH)
No Paul I do not agree. I will agree only to what I show in my last post. Otherwise my…
On No.603 (PH)
After Nikola's notifications, my intention is actually to remove the d phase (and to maintain the a/b/c phases). Do you…
On No.603 (PH)
