wK may be in check if White is on the move. We intuitively accept the concept of forbidden 'auto-check'. But…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
This is exactly the point in No. 352. The goal is auto-stalemate. So, in the final position it is not…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
If we use the logic from P1235849, then there is absolutely no sense in No.352. For example, after 1.d3 any…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
No, please look at this Madrasi logic (that is quite extraordinary...) in the simple example in PDB P1235849. After 2.b4…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
Maybe, f7-f5 was played a move earlier and so Sb7-a5 is legal))
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
The move Sb7-a5 would not have been a legal move for Black in the position with wKe4 because in that…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
Still I do not understand. Some position is proved to be legal only if the last move was f7-f5. Why…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
Yes, I think that Nikola and Kostas came to the right conclusion. The main point is that in consequent seriesmovers…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
Georgy, it is all about the Consequent stipulation: The legality of the position is determined after every move. This means,…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
This is a nice consequent problem and it seems perfectly clear to me. The wK cannot move on the square…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
