Yes, you are right, it is quite funny that consequent seriesmovers ended in two different sections in the FIDE Album...…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
Reading again the last paragraph of my previous reply, I realize that the scenario I was describing cannot happen between…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
Arno, I would agree that in most cases of consequent problems, the retro play is not very deep. Consequent problems…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
In fairy chess there are conditions where you need to take into account the future. In checkless check you may…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
There's a position A and after a single move X there will be a position B. What decides whether X…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
The move may only be considered self-check, if the checking side (black in case of 352) is at least virtually…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
@Nikola: I fear that I do not have a response to your question - that is better left to people…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
wK may be in check if White is on the move. We intuitively accept the concept of forbidden 'auto-check'. But…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
This is exactly the point in No. 352. The goal is auto-stalemate. So, in the final position it is not…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
If we use the logic from P1235849, then there is absolutely no sense in No.352. For example, after 1.d3 any…
On No.352,352.1 (IS,IS&AT)
