Jacques Rotenberg: Yes, I read it. Unfortunately I misread it as "with WHITE pawns on e7 and f7 it is…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Walter Lindenthal, did you read my comment on july 6 ?
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
On further probing this issue the problem seems to be of a different kind as first assumed. At first here…
On No.1687 (CJF)
Let's contemplate it from a different perspective: Is there a specific need for wPg6? You don't need to cover a…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Juraj, you talked about moderation and circumstances and "...some standards that usually better be respected...". Here I never wanted to…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Juraj, thanks for bringing aspects up such as "...there are some standards that usually better be respected otherwise...", or "...can…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
With all due respect, Juraj, I don't quite agree with you. "...Free thinking in fairy chess is more than welcome. ..."…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Now we are at the core of the interpretation! According to Codex FN 18 a PWC or Strict Circe composition…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
(Remark: After retirement now I'm more or less a VERY interested newcomer to problem/fairy/retro-chess with almost no background in orthodox…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
with black pawns on e7 and f7 it is mars-circe legal and it works - C+ I agree with Juraj,…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)