With all due respect, Juraj, I don't quite agree with you. "...Free thinking in fairy chess is more than welcome. ..."…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Now we are at the core of the interpretation! According to Codex FN 18 a PWC or Strict Circe composition…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
(Remark: After retirement now I'm more or less a VERY interested newcomer to problem/fairy/retro-chess with almost no background in orthodox…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
with black pawns on e7 and f7 it is mars-circe legal and it works - C+ I agree with Juraj,…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
I would think the diagram is illegal! In Marscirce a capturing stone is reborn BEFORE capturing. An orthodox pawn here…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
A wonderful twin presentation of Equipollents Anticirce!
On No.1695 (CJF)
Apart from my former comment concerning the alleged "priority" issue, there is another issue to be discussed! Even though you…
On No.1687 (CJF)
It seems important to mention that the inventor of take&make (Laue) did NOT express priority over ANY other FAIRY condition…
On No.1687 (CJF)
The order of moves tested with A to B by Jacobi. Thanks a lot for assistance, Michal!
On No.1723 (PR)
This position looks promising. I see neither reasonable check to force mate, nor any other tempo final position. But nobody…
On No.1723 (PR)