[The bugs in my earlier Popeye version have evidently been removed]. Re your: “my detective work may have been necessary”:…
On No.670 (KM)
Nicolas: It would not have been apparent from my Comments but I have admired your efforts to understand and explain…
On No.670 (KM)
There is an interesting small detail - the notation Ka1*a3=R used by Popeye in my first scheme. It suggests that…
On No.670 (KM)
Unlike you I am confused. You simply do not know what is going on and are trying to figure it…
On No.670 (KM)
If you replace, in your scheme, the bBb7 by a black Locust a8, then 1.Rf8-f3 + is now accepted by…
On No.670 (KM)
I'm not confused at all, as I just want to understand which rules Popeye is using (if some), and not…
On No.670 (KM)
Having the wKh1 still allows the K to capture the bBb7 [even if defended by a bQa8] and does not,…
On No.670 (KM)
Your explanation about Rf3 being illegal is not correct. Rf3 does not appear even with the wK on h1. Also:…
On No.670 (KM)
Incidentally, if all leading magazines use a particular definition – a definition accepted by the fraternity at large – then…
On No.670 (KM)
Oups crossed messages Peter. With my above explanation of which rule Popeye is using, your Rf3+ is illegal as the…
On No.670 (KM)
