Feather at his inventive best as always ! Yes. the mates in the first problem and the mate in Part-b…
On No.653,654,655 (CJF)
The award is just a few days old: http://www.jurajlorinc.com/chess/ann35tt.htm#award
On No.651 (KM)
This compares well with the award winners of that tourney. So probably finished later.
On No.651 (KM)
Very nice! This would have fared well in the recent Juraj Loric's tourney !!
On No.651 (KM)
First of all I should say that I hate long comments, but now I need to do it, because probably…
On No.636 (GF)
You are right of course Diyan. The Locust came into discussion only to show that the square of vanish (for…
On No.636 (GF)
I am sorry to say that but the way how the solution is written now is COMPLETELY WRONG and it…
On No.636 (GF)
I like it! First time I see a pair of imitators moving so gracefully.
On No.643 (JL)
Nice problem. Julia thinks up a neat way of mating with a neutral piece! I have just one doubt... is…
On No.646 (JV)
Good idea to have a nQ to be the mating piece. It too is subject to the restrictions placed upon…
On No.646 (JV)
