Convincing, thanks. Now, what about Imitators in T&M? White Ba1 Black Bc3 Pe2f2 Cond Imitator e1 Cond take&make Popeye (4.68…
To the two Ns: As I was eating my lunch I thought it may help to say the following regarding…
The Be4-g2[lh1] is not illlegal. This is the explanation.
Hm, Be4-f3 is legal because f3 is not occupied by a piece and then the I imitates the move, moving…
Nicolas: You wrote: “Finally, you said that Chris’s definition is ok. Could you please explain why Be4-g2[Ih1] is illegal, although…
Nicolas, standard rules are one thing and Popeye or Winchloe could more or less convincingly obey them but they can…
For sure considering an Imitator as a piece would lead to great theoretical difficulties – for plenty of conditions the…
Your question has already been discussed a bit in my post Nov5 01:59. According to Popeye, your move is illegal…
I would not like to start a similar comprehensive debate as in the case of e.p. However imitator offers similar…
Nikola, your move 1.b7-b5/b6[Ib6/b7] a5*b6 ep.[Ic8] is logic according to your own point of view, which is that b7-b5 has…