A FUNDAMENTAL point is: An Imitator MOVES [in unison with a piece]. If this is born in mind at all…
OK, please open a thread, I'm clumsy with computer stuff. There will be probably many other questions about generalizing the…
Nicolas, the convincing logic is: 1.b7-b5[Ib6] a5*b6 ep.[Ic8] or more precisely: 1.b7-b5/b6[Ib6/b7] a5*b6 ep.[Ic8] since ep.capture determines that bP was…
OK Georgy there is indeed the crucial point in your 6 points: 1. " It is very easy to tell…
It is also interesting to see how is working the Imitator inside an ep-sequence: W: Pa5 B: Pb7 Imitator b8…
This is my last post in this thread, though I may return to this dispute if the question will be…
Well, if there was indeed a hole in the standard rules 13 years ago, then the problem is correct, showing…
Pe2 may move to e3 or alternatively ADVANCE two squares... Only the so called "double-step" is defined as "advancing". All…
Considering the Begley/Caillaud double capture as "near from a joke move" is just my own feeling, it tells nothing about…
"But what in standard rules says that wP has definitively moved to h5 before ep. capture?" The statement 3.7b in…