Yes, your definition says that bP has completed its move on h5. But what in standard rules says that wP…
On No.636 (GF)
Rules are sometimes incomplete and hence, while waiting for a general ep-theory that will apply without any ambiguity to (almost)…
On No.636 (GF)
Sorry, I didn't realise that Nicolas's first example used anti-Take&Make. I thought it used Take&Make, in which case Popeye behaves…
On No.638 (OS)
Nicolas, I didn't speak about my preferences, just about what the standard rules say. wPg5 may capture bP as though…
On No.636 (GF)
Also interesting is to look at the same scheme (wPa2 bPb3 Ic1) in Anticirce. Popeye's way of capturing is: 1.a2*b3[Id2][wPb3->b2]…
On No.638 (OS)
Geoff, In your interesting viewpoint, you are considering that when a move is 2-fold (e.g. in T&M), the Imitator should…
On No.638 (OS)
If I understand correctly you would like, after the move h7-h5(Rh6), to transfer the whole couple (h5,Rh6) to (h6,Rh7) and…
On No.636 (GF)
Well, if the change of standard rules is not defined in Parrain Circe, the ep. capture on h6 is legal.…
On No.636 (GF)
The definition from Fairings is written carelessly and shouldn't be taken seriously. Reprinting the errors is a terrifying custom of…
On No.638 (OS)
It is based on the following scheme: W: Ra8 Pg5 B: Rh8 Ph7 Parrain Circe 1.Rxh8 h5(Rh6) everything normal for…
On No.636 (GF)
