OK Georgy there is indeed the crucial point in your 6 points: 1. " It is very easy to tell…
It is also interesting to see how is working the Imitator inside an ep-sequence: W: Pa5 B: Pb7 Imitator b8…
This is my last post in this thread, though I may return to this dispute if the question will be…
Well, if there was indeed a hole in the standard rules 13 years ago, then the problem is correct, showing…
Pe2 may move to e3 or alternatively ADVANCE two squares... Only the so called "double-step" is defined as "advancing". All…
Considering the Begley/Caillaud double capture as "near from a joke move" is just my own feeling, it tells nothing about…
"But what in standard rules says that wP has definitively moved to h5 before ep. capture?" The statement 3.7b in…
Yes, your definition says that bP has completed its move on h5. But what in standard rules says that wP…
Rules are sometimes incomplete and hence, while waiting for a general ep-theory that will apply without any ambiguity to (almost)…
Sorry, I didn't realise that Nicolas's first example used anti-Take&Make. I thought it used Take&Make, in which case Popeye behaves…