I agree with Nikola. If the word attacked is used then after paralysis they cannot attack any more and hence…
On No.617 (SKB)
Ok, but what is the precise meaning of "hypothetically capturing"? In my Immun example, may bPe4 "hypothetically capture" wPd3, although…
On No.617 (SKB)
I certainly don't expect to provide "a full fairy definition" for anything, but a partial standardization for the most common…
On No.617 (SKB)
I am surprised to see that my simple problem has created such a long dialogue. I do not know the…
On No.617 (SKB)
Immun "a capture is illegal if the (circe) rebirth square of the captured piece is occupied". The same dilemma arises…
On No.617 (SKB)
I agree with you, Kostas, your arguments are clear, logical and above all ethical. However, I think that it is…
On No.612,612.1 (KS&LP)
I certainly agree with a distinction but more precise definitions are desirable. My earlier speculations would mean that in your…
On No.617 (SKB)
So you agree with my distinction above between "observing" and "attacking". I noticed a rather strange fact: consider the position…
On No.617 (SKB)
Terminology should be standardized wherever it could be commonly accepted. I's a bit tricky to define a general meaning of…
On No.617 (SKB)
And in this problem, there are no mutual attacks, bRh4 does not attack wRb4 and bBf5 does not attack wBh5;…
On No.617 (SKB)
