You are right Ganapathy. I saw that the WK is not needed. I liked the cross check effect, that is…
On No.393,393.1 (GG&SK)
Julia ,Seetha, Thank you for the mixed Bristol. The cross-check can be eliminated shifting WK say to h1. The prob.…
On No.393,393.1 (GG&SK)
Dear Seetharaman, Thanks for your comments, I was actually trying for a more complex version as given below: Wh: Kh6…
On No.392 (SKB)
Delightful black queen play. Surpsing that the black queen route to h1 can be controlled with just a black pawn…
On No.391 (PT)
As the WK squares are guarded only on the mating moves, the initial WK moves are a real surprise. Well…
On No.392 (SKB)
Very neat miniature. A study in geometry ! It seems that the two pawns can be removed in this setting:…
On No.393,393.1 (GG&SK)
N.387: The checkmate is specific: 8.Kxb4(Be1)? selfcheck, Rxb4=bQ [bBd1]? selfcheck. This is the good side, but I expect from this…
On No.387,388 (MG)
It takes a lot of effort just to understand the solutions! In the first solution 1...NAg1 must be played to…
On No.390 (MP)
Nice changes. I think this cycle has been done in orthodox problems. (fivefold?) Nevertheless a very interesting problem with G-motifs.…
On No.389 (KM)
Nice problem, but was is the threat? No grasshopper can go to a2 after key, but 2.Gb3# is possible. Misprint?
On No.389 (KM)
