No.667 Nicolas Dupont (France) |
Original Problems, Julia’s Fairies – 2014 (III): September – December →Previous ; →Next ; →List 2014(III) Please send your original fairy problems to: julia@juliasfairies.com |
No.667 by Nicolas Dupont – PG problem demonstrating a new variation of Anti-Take&Make! (JV)
Definition:
Anti-Take & Make Type II: When a piece is captured (King excluded), it immediately moves without capture from its vanishing square, using a moving possibility of the capturing piece (color included). The “take” is forbidden if not followed by such a “make”, chosen by the capturing piece’s side.
No.667 Nicolas Dupont |
Solution: (click to show/hide) |
white Bf1c1 Ke1 Qd1 Ph2g2f2e2d2c2b2a2 Sg1b1 Rh1a1
black Bf8c8 Ke8 Qd8 Ph7g7f7e7d7c7b7a7 Sg8b8 Rh8a8
PG6 (16+16) |
|
Looks very nice. Such using of fairy conditions in PGs gives an another view of the possibilities in this genre.
Thanks Diyan. It is worth to compare the 4 « make » possibilities, after a given “take” part, according to which piece is moving (the capturing one or the captured one), and according to which type of moving way is used (the own one or the opponent one). As an example with WPa2, BPb3 and “take” part a2xb3, we get the following homogeneous picture:
T&M: WPb3 -> b2 (capturing, opponent)
Anti-T&M: BPb3 -> b2 (captured, own)
T&M type II: WPb3 -> b4 (capturing, own)
Anti-T&M type II: BPb3 -> b4 (captured, opponent)
Anti T&M and their variations is now possible to check with Jacobi (use the condition Couscous for type II), and the problem is C+ Jacobi!