Great work by Shankar
On FCCP: August 2022 Update!
Finally, I've tried so many further (unconventional) approaches with the given stones, but all of them resulted in more than…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
By removing stones (e.g. without bBh1) you might find other "valid" (shorter) solutions: 1.Qg8 2-5.Sf3-e1-c2-a1/a3 6.g1=S 7.Qf8 Q×d2# (via d1)
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Without wPg6, we have an alternative solution: 1.Qg8 2.Sf3 3.Se5 4.Sg6 5.Sh8 6.Qf8 7.g1=R 8.Rg2 Q-d1xd2#
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Without bBa5, we have a shorter solution: 1.Qg8 2.Sf3 3.g1=S 4.Se1 5.Sg2 Q-d1xd2#
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Tested also by Jacobi with this input: cond marscirce stip ser-h#8 forsyth 2rkrq2/2P1PPQ1/6PK/b5P1/7p/7p/3pP1pP/6sb (in less than an hour)
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Yes, you're right! The wQd2 can neither mate directly, she too requires the empty home square d1 for the mate…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
I hardly dare to maintain my objection, but I still think this is NOT a unique solution! What about the…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Oh my god, how embarrassing! Yes your're absolutely right, it's a unique ser-h#8 then, how could I've lost sight of…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)
Honestly? A good problem is one that combines illegality (impossibility) of the diagram with disregard of standing principles (rules)? I…
On No.1688 (AG&DP)