Oh indeed, thanks Joost. So, that's why the pin by 3.Rh8-e8 isn't good, since a pin by 4.Re2/f8 would legally…
On No.1717 (EH)
deleted
On No.1717 (EH)
What is the difference between the pin after 3.Rh1 and the apparently similar pin 4.Rh1-f1 (after 3...Kf2+)?
On No.1717 (EH)
Very interesting. But it is a little confusing. I thought Ra1 was pinned by Rh1 and hence no mate (after…
On No.1717 (EH)
a technical point : you can think about a mate on a8 with black reaching g5 in 2 moves :…
On No.1704 (BG&TM)
Author artificially puts the pieces on the board and creates a new world with specific relations & features, to present…
On No.1713 (AO)
In our chess art many things are artificial in a varying degree. The weight of the question is how each…
On No.1713 (AO)
> I wouldn’t ‘pay’ for such a fake ‘addition’ to a product. I understand your point of view. But I…
On No.1713 (AO)
It's upside-down reasoning, 'justifying' a superfluous element by adding a completely superfluous piece. I wouldn't 'pay' for such a fake…
On No.1713 (AO)
Without bRh1 a Circe-reborning of wPh2 would be non-used. And I tnink it's bad because it's inadequate using of the…
On No.1713 (AO)