No.1237
Paul Rãican (Romania)

Original Retro & PG problems
JF – R2017-18


Definition: (click to show/hide)


No.1237 Paul Rãican
Romania

original – 15.09.2017

Solution: (click to show/hide)

neutral Ig7a8c8d8e8f8g8h8a7b7c7d7e7b8h7g4f3a2b2g2h2a1b1c1f1g1

PG 6.5   #1 by Black  (0+0+26)    (C-)
Undefined pieces
Volage Chess


No.1237.1 Paul Rãican
Romania

version of No.1237 – 18.04.2018

Solution: (click to show/hide)

white Oa1a2b1b2c1d1e2f2g1g2 black Od5h3 Ra8h8 Sb8g8 Bc8f8 Qd8 Ke8 Pa7b7c7d7e7g7h7

PG 6.5   #1                    (10+17)    (C-)
Masked Units
Volage Chess


Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
François Labelle
François Labelle
September 18, 2017 21:45

Many different cooks found by the program I’m working on. For example:

1.Sh3=b Sf4 2.c3=b Sxe2 3.Bxe2 f6=w 4.O-O cxd2 5.Qxd2=b Qxe2 6.fxe7 Qg4 7.f3=b Qxg2#
1.c3=b f6=w 2.d3=b dxe2 3.fxe7 exf1=S 4.Qg4 Sxh2 5.f3=b Sxg4 6.Kf1 cxb2 7.Rh2=b bxc1=R#
1.f3=b fxe2 2.c3=b exf1=S 3.Qg4 cxd2+ 4.Kd1 dxc1=S 5.Kxc1 f5 6.Sf3=b fxg4 7.Rg1=b Se3#

Ladislav Packa
Ladislav Packa
September 19, 2017 17:59

Can you test the correctness of this type of PG?

François Labelle
François Labelle
September 20, 2017 02:32
Reply to  Ladislav Packa

Yes, but only for fairy conditions that I have programmed. I programmed Volage specially to be able to test this problem. I’ll be releasing my program soon so that everyone can test problems. I don’t think I have any choice, if I’m the only one with this tool then my personal mailbox will be filled with private requests from composers to test their originals. 🙂

Ladislav Packa
Ladislav Packa
September 20, 2017 15:54

I suppose the Orthodox rules should be without problems. Could you test me a short SPG (dia8.5)?

François Labelle
François Labelle
September 21, 2017 01:37
Reply to  Ladislav Packa

I prefer if you wait for my program. With fewer distractions I can finish it sooner. I think I can get the first version out sometime in October.

seetharaman
seetharaman
April 21, 2018 21:03
Reply to  Ladislav Packa

I thought Popeye checks it.

Georgy Evseev
Georgy Evseev
April 21, 2018 10:35

Is it really “big unmasking” in 1237.1?
Or is it simply a diagram error?

Paul Rãican
Paul Rãican
April 21, 2018 15:52

Yes, indeed, 15 units are visible, because it is this position which I verified with Jacobi.

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x