Yes, but in this case wS is not paralyzed by its own move.
Georgy, the same question you can ask for the same position even in orthodox chess. What would be the answer?
I can not understand meaning of this question. Mate, of course, after 1.Sf2# or 1.Sg3#. What is not clear here?
Thanks Petkov, Julia and Geoff Foster for this excellent article. The examples are brilliant and instructive. Part (d)(1) correctly explains…
Of course I was wrong ! White simply moves the intended neutral piece away after black king move !
Pretty idea! It seems that Anti Andernach condition not necessary if Neutral R & B are used. I could be…
That's exactly what I expected. The problem is very nice, with reciprocal capture of neutral mating pieces achieved in a…
Twin must be b) Bf8->h7.
For interchanges of pieces, see M. Caillaud, Prize, Nunspeet 2000: 1. e4 c6 2. e5 Qa5 3. e6 Kd8 4.…
My position was with the WP on the a-file hs#6.5. The rook promotion of the white pawn did not strike…