No.962 Aleksey Oganesjan (Russia) |
Original Problems, Julia’s Fairies – 2015 (II): July – December →Previous ; →Next ; →List 2015(II) Please send your original fairy problems to: julia@juliasfairies.com |
No.962 by Aleksey Oganesjan – Underpromotions and bicolor Bristol in HS# Meredith without fairy pieces. (JV)
No.962.1 by Aleksey Oganesjan – An improved version of No.962, after comment by N.Predrag. (JV)
No.962 Aleksey Oganesjan |
Solutions: (click to show/hide) |
White Kg8 Qa2 Rh5 Ra1 Bg1 Ph7 Pa4
Black Ka5 Be5 Pa7 Pa6 Pb2
hs#3,5 zero (7+5) a) Bg1→g7; b) Kg8→g2 |
|
|
|
No.962.1 Aleksey Oganesjan |
Solutions: (click to show/hide) |
White Kg2 Qa2 Rh5 Ph7 Pg6 Pa3
Black Ka5 Be5 Pa7 Pg7 Pa6 Pa4 Pd2
hs#3,5 zero (6+7) |
|
Very nice! Is it better to have the black pawn b2 at d2?
No, it’s not better, because if bPb2->d2 then cooks in a) will appear:
1…Kb4/Kb6 2.a5 Kb5 3.Bf8 d1Q 4.Qd5+ Qxd5#
(and three more cooks, with another order of moves)
bPd2 would be better because in a), 3….Rd8-a8 would be a critical Bristol-move across b8. Rb8-a8 is not a Bristol-move.
And wB has a function of a Dummy which is too expensive for a helpselfmate. bP g7/h2 would be much cheaper than wB g7/g1.
Also, wRa1 is only a static guard of a4 which could be blocked by bP which could be immobilized by wPa3.
hm…. bph2/g7 is an obvious choice, but how to stop h2 pawn for the ZZ finale?
You are right of course. I tested with expensive BSa4!
Yes, you are right – the version with bSa4 and bPb2->d2 is correct, and I saw it during composing… But in this case the mates are not model (in view of this bSa4). Also, according a principle of economy, I prefer the published version with wPa4.
Zero-position, just as the original:
White Ph7 Pg6 Rh5 Pa3 Qa2 Kg2
Black Pa7 Pg7 Pa6 Ka5 Be5 Pa4 Pd2
Hs#3.5; Zero Move g2 g8; Twin Move g7 h2