Bojan Bašić
The most convenient way to imagine invisible pieces is (for me) as follows. Imagine that two players play the game…
On No.1463(EH)
Here is a different problem with the same twinning mechanism. Michel Caillaud Special HM 10th TT Chess Composition Microweb C…
On No.1684 (JC&BM)
Theoretically, it can, with sstip white 16hh[1a[#]d & 2ad[#]] However, it would take too long.
On No.1611 (TL)
You are right about the forward defence in the second variation (sorry about that, I concentrated on the first variation…
On No.1524 (DB)
How about this, seems like a cook in 32? -1.Ke1×Pd2(+wKe1) d3-d2+ -2.Ke1×Rd1(+wKe1) Rd2-d1+ -3.Kf2×Bg2(+wKe1) Rd1-d2+ -4.Kf1-f2 Ba8-g2++ -5.Ke1-f1 Rd2-d1+ -6.Kf2×Sf1(+wKe1)…
On No.1524 (DB)
The first problem seems cooked in 3 moves: 1.Ke8(+bPd7)+ Q~ 2.Rh8(+wPh7)+ Ke7 3.Ke8(+bPe7)#; 1.... Ke7 2.f5#.
On No.1005,1006 (SNR)
Of course, if you think we could produce something together, I will be glad to give it a try. You…
On GET OFF, MOVE ON or STAY PUT! By Chris Tylor
I am sorry, Bojan; I have been too busy working on this Fairy Classification project of Julia’s to think very…
On GET OFF, MOVE ON or STAY PUT! By Chris Tylor
Here is my attempt to fix B5.4: remove bRa7, move wBa3->d6, move wSe7->a7. The intended solution now is: 1.{Rc1,Sc2} {Sc8,Rd6,Bf6}…
On GET OFF, MOVE ON or STAY PUT! By Chris Tylor
Dear Chris, Thank you for your answers. I will try to respond to the points you raised. So I wonder…
On GET OFF, MOVE ON or STAY PUT! By Chris Tylor